English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We conducted a questionnaire study aimed towards PhD students in the field ofvisualization research to understand how they cope with paper rejections. Wecollected responses from 24 participants and performed a qualitative analysisof the data in relation to the provided support by collaborators, resubmissionstrategies, handling multiple rejects, and personal impression of the reviews.The results indicate that the PhD students in the visualization communitygenerally cope well with the negative reviews and, with experience, learn howto act accordingly to improve and resubmit their work. Our results reveal themain coping strategies that can be applied for constructively handling rejectedvisualization papers. The most prominent strategies include: discussing reviewswith collaborators and making a resubmission plan, doing a major revision toimprove the work, shortening the work, and seeing rejection as a positivelearning experience.

How Visualization PhD Students Cope with Paper Rejections