English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This document posits that, at best, a tenuous case can be made for providingAI exclusive IP over their "inventions". Furthermore, IP protections for AI areunlikely to confer the benefit of ensuring regulatory compliance. Rather, IPprotections for AI "inventors" present a host of negative externalities andobscures the fact that the genuine inventor, deserving of IP, is the humanagent. This document will conclude by recommending strategies for WIPO to bringIP law into the 21st century, enabling it to productively account for AI"inventions".  Theme: IP Protection for AI-Generated and AI-Assisted Works Based on insightsfrom the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) staff and supplemented byworkshop contributions from the AI Ethics community convened by MAIEI on July5, 2020.

Montreal AI Ethics Institute's (MAIEI) Submission to the World  Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Conversation on Intellectual  Property (IP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Second Session