English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper compares two policies which can be used for multiplexing thetraffic of a number of players of a First Person Shooter game. A networkscenario in which a number of players share an access network has beensimulated, in order to compare the policies in terms of a subjective qualityestimator. The first policy, namely timeout, achieves higher bandwidth savings,while the second one, period, introduces less delay and jitter. The resultsshow that the difference in terms of QoE is only significant when the number ofplayers is small. Thus, in order to make the correct decision, the concretenetwork scenario and the characteristics of the router would have to beconsidered in each case, taking into account the estimation of the subjectivequality that can be expected.

Comparison of Multiplexing Policies for FPS Games in terms of Subjective Quality