English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In [Ritika Garg et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 069901(E) (2019)] the experimentalresults on the polarization asysmetry were revised due to a claimed change ofthe geometry asymmetry. However, the revised results can not be reproduced asclaimed in the erratum by simply changing the geometry asymmetry in extractingthe polarization asymmetry, without re-extracting the polarization asymmetryfrom the original experimental data. It is possible that the quoted errors weresignificantly underestimated.

Comment on "Erratum: Negative-parity high-spin states and a possible  magnetic rotation band in $^{135}_{59}$Pr$_{76}$ [Phys. Rev. C 92, 054325  (2015)]"