English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We propose a new, structured, logic-based framework for legal reasoning andargumentation: Instead of using a single, unstructured meaning space, theorygraphs organize knowledge and inference into collections of modular meaningspaces organized by inheritance and interpretation. Context graphs extendtheory graphs by attack relations and interpret theories as knowledge contextsof agents in argumentation. We introduce the context graph paradigm by modelingthe well-studied case Popov v. Hayashi, concentrating on the role of analogicalreasoning in context graphs.

Context Graphs for Legal Reasoning and Argumentation