English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This seemed impossible to use a theoretically adequate but too sophisticatedrisk measure called non-ruin capital, whence its widespread (includingregulatory documents) replacement with an inadequate, but simple risk measurecalled Value-at-Risk. Conflicting with the idea by Albert Einstein that"everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler", this led tofallacious, and even deceitful (but generally accepted) standards andrecommendations. Arguing from the standpoint of mathematical theory of risk, weaim to break this impasse.

Value-at-Risk substitute for non-ruin capital is fallacious and redundant