English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The homologation of automated vehicles, being safety-critical complexsystems, requires sound evidence for their safe operability. Traditionally,verification and validation activities are guided by a combination of ISO 26262and ISO/PAS 21448, together with distance-based testing. Starting at SAE Level3, such approaches become infeasible, resulting in the need for novel methods.Scenario-based testing is regarded as a possible enabler for verification andvalidation of automated vehicles. Its effectiveness, however, rests on theconsistency and substantiality of the arguments used in each step of theprocess. In this work, we sketch a generic framework around scenario-basedtesting and analyze contemporary approaches to the individual steps. For eachstep, we describe its function, discuss proposed approaches and solutions, andidentify the underlying arguments, principles and assumptions. As a result, wepresent a list of fundamental considerations for which evidences need to begathered in order for scenario-based testing to support the homologation ofautomated vehicles.

Fundamental Considerations around Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving