English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Recently, our work regarding the definition of oscillating neutrino states inEur. Phys. J. C 80: 68 (2020), arxiv:1902.01232 [hep-ph] has been commentedupon in arXiv:2004.04739 [hep-ph]. In this note we show that, contrary to theclaim in the comment, our above-mentioned work cannot be reproduced in thescheme of the so-called flavour Fock space approach described in the comment.Moreover, we prove explicitly that a flavour Fock space cannot exist in a modelwith massive mixed neutrinos. If the flavour Fock space scheme were viable, itwould necessarily lead, as a consequence of Coleman's theorem, to the flavournumber invariance of the Hamiltonian of mixed neutrino fields, while theHamiltonian is by construction flavour number violating. Quod est absurdum.

Comment on the Comment on the paper "Can oscillating neutrino states be formulated universally?''