English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Although almost all information about Smart Contract addresses is shared viawebsites, emails, or other forms of digital communication, Blockchains anddistributed ledger technology are unable to establish secure bindings betweenwebsites and corresponding Smart Contracts. For a user, it is impossible todifferentiate whether a website links to a legitimate Smart Contract set up byowners of a business or to an illicit contract aiming to steal users' funds.Surprisingly, current attempts to solve this issue mostly comprise ofinformation redundancy, e.g., displaying contract addresses multiple times invarying forms of images and texts. These processes are burdensome, as the useris responsible for verifying the correctness of an address. More importantly,they do not address the core issue, as the contract itself does not containinformation about its authenticity. To solve current issues for theseapplications and increase security, we propose a solution that facilitatespublicly issued SSL/TLS-certificates of Fully-Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) toensure the authenticity of Smart Contracts and their owners. Our approachcombines on-chain identity assertion utilizing signatures from the respectivecertificate and off-chain authentication of the Smart Contract stored on theBlockchain. This approach allows to tackle the aforementioned issue and furtherenables applications such as the identification of consortia members inpermissioned networks. The system is open and transparent, as the onlyrequirement for usage is ownership of an SSL/TLS-certificate. To enableprivacy-preserving authenticated Smart Contracts, we allow one-way and two-waybinding between website and contract. Further, low creation and maintenancecosts, a widely accepted public key infrastructure and user empowerment willdrive potential adaption of Ethereum Authenticated Smart Contracts (AuthSC).

AuthSC: Mind the Gap between Web and Smart Contracts