English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a recent comment [1] on our paper [2] Syrwid, Kosior, and Sacha (SKS)asserted that we did not correctly calculate the chiral soliton energy ${\calE}_{LAB}$ in the lab frame, and further that the system we proposed is notcapable of supporting a genuine quantum time crystal. We concede that we didnot correctly calculate ${\cal E}_{LAB}$ but we illustrate below that oursystem can nonetheless display time crystal behavior with a ground state thatis spatially localized and rotating.

Response to comment on "Quantum time crystals and interacting gauge theories in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates" by Syrwid, Kosior, and Sacha