English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It has been previously shown that any measurement system specificrelationship (SSR)/ mathematical-model Y_d = f_d ({X_m}) or so is bracketedwith certain parameters which should prefix the achievable-accuracy/uncertainty (e_d^Y) of a desired result y_d. Here we clarify how theelement-specific-expressions of isotopic abundances and/ or atomic weight couldbe parametrically distinguished from one another, and the achievable accuracybe even a priori predicted. It is thus signified that, irrespective of whetherthe measurement-uncertainty (u_m) could be purely random by origin or not,e_d^Y should be a systematic parameter. Further, by property-governing-factors,any SSR should belong to either variable-independent (F.1) or -dependent (F.2)family of SSRs/ models. The SSRs here are shown to be the members of the F.2family. That is, it is pointed out that, and explained why, the uncertainty (e)of determining an either isotopic abundance or atomic weight should vary, evenfor any given measurement-accuracy(s) u_m(s), as a function of themeasurable-variable(s) X_m(s). However, the required computational-step hasbeen shown to behave as an error-sink in the overall process of indirectmeasurement in question.

Uncertainty evaluation in the estimates of isotopic abundances and  atomic weight of any element: a unique application of the theory of  uncertainty for derived results