English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A Hilbert space operator $A\in\B$ is left $(X,m)$-invertible by $B\in\B$(resp., $B\in\B$ is an $(X,m)$-adjoint of $A\in\B$) for some operator $X\in\B$if$\triangle_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{m-j}XA^{m-j}=0$(resp.,$\delta_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{(m-j)}XA^j=0$).No Drazin invertible operator $A\in\B$, with Drazin inverse $A_d$, can be left$(I,m)$-invertible (equivalently, $m$-invertible) by its adjoint or its Drazininverse or the adjoint of its Drazin inverse. For Drazin inverrtible operators$A$, it is seen that the existence of an $X$ acts as a conduit for implications$\triangle_{B,A}(X)=0\Longrightarrow \delta^m_{C,A}(X)=0$, where the pair$(B,C)=$ either $(A,A_d)$ or $(A_d,A)$ or $(A^*,A^*_d)$ or $(A^*_d,A^*)$.Reverse implications fail. Assuming certain commutativity conditions, it isseen that $\triangle_{A^*_d,A}^m(X)=0=\triangle^n_{B^*_d,B}(Y)$ implies$\delta^{m+n-1}_{A^*B^*,AB}(XY)=0=\delta^{m+n-1}_{A^*+B^*,A+B}(XY)$.

Left m-invertibility by the adjoint of Drazin inverse and m-selfadjointness of Hilbert space operators