English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper bridges a historiographical gap in accounts of the prediction anddiscovery of the positron by combining three ingredients. First, the predictionand discovery of the positron are situated in the broader context of a periodof 'crystallisation' of a research tradition. Second, the prediction anddiscovery of the positron are discussed in the context of the 'authentication'of the particle. Third, the attitude of the relevant scientists to bothprediction and discovery are conceptualised in terms of the idea of'perspectives'. It will be argued that by examining the prediction anddiscovery of the positron in the context of authentication within a period ofcrystallisation, we can better understand disagreements regarding the positronbetween relevant scientists (Dirac, Bohr, and Pauli) in the period 1931-34.

Diagnosing Disagreements: The Authentication of the Positron 1931-1934