English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Developer contribution guidelines are used in social coding sites like GitHubto explain and shape the process a project expects contributors to follow. Theyset standards for all participants and "save time and hassle caused byimproperly created pull requests or issues that have to be rejected andresubmitted" (GitHub). Yet, we lack a systematic understanding of the contentof a typical contribution guideline, as well as the extent to which theseguidelines are followed in practice. Additionally, understanding how guidelinesmay impact projects that use Continuous Integration as part of the contributionprocess is of particular interest. To address this knowledge gap, we conducteda mixed-methods study of 53 GitHub projects with explicit contributionguidelines and coded the guidelines to extract key themes. We then created aprocess model using GitHub activity data (e.g., commit, new issue, new pullrequest) to compare the actual activity with the prescribed contributionguidelines. We show that approximately 68% of these projects divergesignificantly from the expected process.

Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Do Contribution Guidelines Match the GitHub Contribution Process?