English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Near distances are overestimated in virtual reality, and far distances areunderestimated, but an explanation for these distortions remains elusive. Onepotential concern is that whilst the eye rotates to look at the virtual scene,the virtual cameras remain static. Could using eye-tracking to change theperspective of the virtual cameras as the eye rotates improve depth perceptionin virtual reality? This paper identifies 14 distinct perspective distortionsthat could in theory occur from keeping the virtual cameras fixed whilst theeye rotates in the context of near-eye displays. However, the impact of eyemovements on the displayed image depends on the optical, rather than physical,distance of the display. Since the optical distance of most head-mounteddisplays is over 1m, most of these distortions will have only a negligibleeffect. The exception are 'gaze-contingent disparities', which will leave nearvirtual objects looking displaced from physical objects that are meant to be atthe same distance in augmented reality.

Would Gaze-Contingent Rendering Improve Depth Perception in Virtual and Augmented Reality?