English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The answers people give when asked to 'think of the unexpected' for everydayevent scenarios appear to be more expected than unexpected. There are expectedunexpected outcomes that closely adhere to the given information in a scenario,based on familiar disruptions and common plan-failures. There are alsounexpected unexpected outcomes that are more inventive, that depart from giveninformation, adding new concepts/actions. However, people seem to tend toconceive of the unexpected as the former more than the latter. Study 1 teststhese proposals by analysing the object-concepts people mention in theirreports of the unexpected and the agreement between their answers. Study 2shows that object-choices are weakly influenced by recency, the order ofsentences in the scenario. The implications of these results for ideas inphilosophy, psychology and computing is discussed

The Unexpected Unexpected and the Expected Unexpected: How People's Conception of the Unexpected is Not That Unexpected