English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

For-profit editors such as Elsevier and Springer have been subject tosustained criticism from academics and university libraries, including calls toboycott, and discontinued subscriptions. Mathematicians have played aparticularly active role in this critique, and have endeavored to imagine newpublication practices and create new journals. This motivates the monitoring ofthe share of articles published by different editors. I used data fromMathSciNet over the period 2000-2017, and focused on the 100 journals withhighest citations per article. Within this category, the share of articlespublished by Elsevier and Springer has steadily increased over this period,from about a third to almost half of the total.

On the share of mathematics published by Elsevier and Springer