English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

With the advent of Open Science, researchers have started to publish theirresearch artefacts (i. e., data, software, and other products of theinvestigations) in order to allow others to reproduce their investigations.While this publication is beneficial for science in general, it often lacks acomprehensive documentation and completeness with respect to the artefacts.This, in turn, prevents the successful reproduction of the analyses. Typicalexamples are missing scripts, incomplete datasets or specification of usedsoftware. Moreover, issues about licences often create legal concerns. This istrue for the use of commercial software but also for the publication ofresearch artefacts without proper sharing licence. As a result, the solepublication of research artefacts does not automatically result in reproducibleresearch.  To empirically confirm this, we have been systematically analysing researchpublications that also published their investigations as Jupyter notebooks. Inthis paper, we present preliminary results of this analysis for fivepublications. The results show, that the quality of the published researchartefacts must be improved in order to assure reproducibility.

Reproducible Research is more than Publishing Research Artefacts: A Systematic Analysis of Jupyter Notebooks from Research Articles