English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In recent years, there has been discussion in the literature regardingmethods of estimating the magnitude of the minimum principal stress fromsubsurface fracture injection tests, commonly called Diagnostic FractureInjection Tests (DFITs). McClure et al. (2016) used modeling and mathematicalanalysis to propose that changes should be made to common interpretationtechniques. Subsequently, Craig et al. (2017) attempted to refute thosefindings using field and laboratory observations. This discussion paper reviewsthe interpretations from Craig et al. (2017) and concludes that theirconclusions are unsupported by the data presented.

Discussion of the Paper SPE-187038-MS: Fracture Closure Stress:  Reexamining Field and Laboratory Experiments of Fracture Closure Using Modern  Interpretation Methodologies