English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It can be insightful to extend qualitative studies with a secondaryquantitative analysis (where the former suggests insightful questions that thelatter can answer). Documenting developer beliefs should be the start, not theend, of Software Engineering research. Once prevalent beliefs are found, theyshould be checked against real-world data. For example, this paper findsseveral notable discrepancies between empirical evidence and the developerbeliefs documented in Wan et al.'s recent TSE paper "Perceptions, expectations,and challenges in defect prediction". By reporting these discrepancies we canstop developers (a) wasting time on inconsequential matters or (b) ignoringimportant effects. For the future, we would encourage more "extension studies"of prior qualitative results with quantitative empirical evidence.

Assessing Developer Beliefs: A Reply to "Perceptions, Expectations, and Challenges in Defect Prediction"