English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

HRI researchers have made major strides in developing robotic architecturesthat are capable of reading a limited set of social cues and producingbehaviors that enhance their likeability and feeling of comfort amongst humans.However, the cues in these models are fairly direct and the interactionslargely dyadic. To capture the normative qualities of interaction morerobustly, we propose consent as a distinct, critical area for HRI research.Convening important insights in existing HRI work around topics like touch,proxemics, gaze, and moral norms, the notion of consent reveals keyexpectations that can shape how a robot acts in social space. By sortingvarious kinds of consent through social and legal doctrine, we delineateempirical and technical questions to meet consent challenges faced in majorapplication domains and robotic roles. Attention to consent could show, forexample, how extraordinary, norm-violating actions can be justified by agentsand accepted by those around them. We argue that operationalizing ideas fromlegal scholarship can better guide how robotic systems might cultivate andsustain proper forms of consent.

When Exceptions are the Norm: Exploring the Role of Consent in HRI