English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This contribution investigate the compatibility between the use ofdematerialised voting and Article 3 of the french Constitution, whichstipulates that 'voting must always be universal, equal and secret'. The ITrisk management of electronic voting is managed in a rational way like anyother risk management areas. We are therefore prepared to accept the use of anon dematerialised technique to cover a significant, well-identified andunavoidable risk. However, research has shown that a verifiable dematerializedvote intrinsically loses its anonymity. In addition, a study of the history ofvulnerabilities shows that no terminal in recent years has been able toguarantee the anonymity of its connection and that personal voting data hasalways been potentially exposed. Electronic voting systems are therefore, tothe best of our knowledge, unable to provide the required constitutionalguarantee.

Contribution of Herv{\'e} Suaudeau for the mission of the French Senate Law Commission on electronic voting on 25 January 2018