English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In benchmarking international research, although publication and citationanalyses should not be used to compare different disciplines, scientometristsfrequently fail to resist the temptation to present rankings based on totalpublications and citations. Such measures are affected by significantdistortions, due to the uneven fertility across scientific disciplines and thedishomogeneity of scientific specialisation among nations and universities. Inthis paper, we provide an indication of the extent of the distortions whencomparative bibliometric analyses fail to recognise the range of levels ofscientific fertility, not only within a given major disciplinary area but alsowithin the different scientific disciplines encompassed by the same area.

Measuring science: irresistible temptations, easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences