English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Terms like 'misinformation', 'fake news', and 'echo chambers' permeatecurrent discussions on the state of the Internet. We believe a lack oftechnological support to evaluate, contest, and reason about informationonline---as opposed to merely disseminating it---lies at the root of theseproblems. Several argument technologies support such functionality, but haveseen limited use outside of niche communities. Most research systemsoveremphasize argument analysis and structure, standing in stark contrast withthe informal dialectical nature of everyday argumentation. Conversely,non-academic systems overlook important implications for design which can bederived from theory. In this paper, we present the design of a system aiming tostrike a balance between structured argumentation and ease of use. Socratreesis a website for collaborative argumentative discussion targeting layman users,but includes sophisticated community guidelines and novel features inspired byinformal logic. During an exploratory study, we evaluate the usefulness of ourimposed structure on argumentation and investigate how users perceive it.Contributing to arguments remains a complex task, but most users learned to doso effectively with minimal guidance and all recognized that the structure ofSocratrees may improve online discussion and results in a clearer overview ofarguments.

Socratrees: Exploring the Design of Argument Technology for Layman Users