English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Today, online privacy is the domain of regulatory measures andprivacy-enhancing technologies. Transparency in the form of external and publicassessments has been proposed for improving privacy and security because itexposes otherwise hidden deficiencies. Previous work has studied privacyattitudes and behavior of consumers. However, little is known on howorganizations react to measures that employ public "naming and shaming" as anincentive for improvement. We performed the first study on this aspect byconducting a qualitative survey with 152 German health insurers. We scannedtheir websites with PrivacyScore.org to generate a public ranking andconfronted the insurers with the results. We obtained a response rate of 27%.Responses ranged from positive feedback to legal threats. Only 12% of the sites- mostly non-responders - improved during our study. Our results show thatinsurers struggle due to unawareness, reluctance, and incapability, anddemonstrate the general difficulties of transparency-based approaches.

On the Difficulties of Incentivizing Online Privacy through Transparency: A Qualitative Survey of the German Health Insurance Market