English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Android's graphical password unlock remains one of the most widely usedschemes for phone unlock authentication, and it is has been studied extensivelyin the last decade since its launch. We have learned that users' choice ofpatterns mimics the poor password choices in other systems, such as PIN ortext-based passwords. A wide variety of analysis and data collections methodswas used to reach these conclusions, but what is missing from the literature isa systemized comparison of the related work in this space that compares boththe methodology and the results. In this paper, we take a detailed accountingof the different methods applied to data collection and analysis for Androidunlock patterns. We do so in two dimensions. First we systemize prior work intoa detailed taxonomy of collection methods, and in the second dimension, weperform a detailed analysis of 9 different data sets collected using differentmethods. While this study focuses singularly on the collection methods andcomparisons of the Android pattern unlock scheme, we believe that many of thefindings generalize to other graphical password schemes, unlock authenticationtechnology, and other knowledge-based authentication schemes.

A Survey of Collection Methods and Cross-Data Set Comparison of Android Unlock Patterns