English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To improve the quality and efficiency of research, groups within thescientific community seek to exploit the value of data sharing. Funders,institutions, and specialist organizations are developing and implementingstrategies to encourage or mandate data sharing within and across disciplines,with varying degrees of success. Academic journals in ecology and evolutionhave adopted several types of public data archiving policies requiring authorsto make data underlying scholarly manuscripts freely available. Yet anecdotesfrom the community and studies evaluating data availability suggest that thesepolicies have not obtained the desired effects, both in terms of quantity andquality of available datasets. We conducted a qualitative, interview-basedstudy with journal editorial staff and other stakeholders in the academicpublishing process to examine how journals enforce data archiving policies. Wespecifically sought to establish who editors and other stakeholders perceive asresponsible for ensuring data completeness and quality in the peer reviewprocess. Our analysis revealed little consensus with regard to how dataarchiving policies should be enforced and who should hold authors accountablefor dataset submissions. Themes in interviewee responses included hopefulnessthat reviewers would take the initiative to review datasets and trust inauthors to ensure the completeness and quality of their datasets. We highlightproblematic aspects of these thematic responses and offer potential startingpoints for improvement of the public data archiving process.

Enforcing public data archiving policies in academic publishing: A study of ecology journals