English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This is an analysis of the recently published article `Quantum theory cannotconsistently describe the use of itself' by D. Frauchiger and R.Renner~\cite{1}. Here I decipher the paradox and analyze it from the point ofview of de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory (i.e., Bohmian mechanics). Ialso analyze the problem from the perspective obtained by the Copenhageninterpretation (i.e., the Bohrian interpretation) and show that both views areself consistent and do not lead to any contradiction with a `single-world'description of quantum theory.

About Wigner Friend's and Hardy's paradox in a Bohmian approach: a comment of `Quantum theory cannot' consistently describe the use of itself'