English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The discussion between the automotive industry, governments, ethicists,policy makers and general public about autonomous cars' moral agency iswidening, and therefore we see the need to bring more insight into whatmeta-factors might actually influence the outcomes of such discussions, surveysand plebiscites. In our study, we focus on the psychological (personalitytraits), practical (active driving experience), gender and rhetoric/framingfactors that might impact and even determine respondents' a priori preferencesof autonomous cars' operation. We conducted an online survey (N=430) to collectdata that show that the third person scenario is less biased than the firstperson scenario when presenting ethical dilemma related to autonomous cars.According to our analysis, gender bias should be explored in more extensivefuture studies as well. We recommend any participatory technology assessmentdiscourse to use the third person scenario and to direct attention to the wayany autonomous car related debate is introduced, especially in terms oflinguistic and communication aspects and gender.

What might matter in autonomous cars adoption: first person versus third person scenarios