English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We consider a partially asymmetric multi-players zero-sum game with twostrategic variables. All but one players have the same payoff functions, andone player (Player $n$) does not. Two strategic variables are $t_i$'s and$s_i$'s for each player $i$. Mainly we will show the following results. 1) Theequilibrium when all players choose $t_i$'s is equivalent to the equilibriumwhen all but one players choose $t_i$'s and Player $n$ chooses $s_n$ as theirstrategic variables. 2) The equilibrium when all players choose $s_i$'s isequivalent to the equilibrium when all but one players choose $s_i$'s andPlayer $n$ chooses $t_n$ as their strategic variables. The equilibrium when allplayers choose $t_i$'s and the equilibrium when all players choose $s_i$'s arenot equivalent although they are equivalent in a symmetric game in which allplayers have the same payoff functions.

Nash equilibrium in asymmetric multi-players zero-sum game with two strategic variables and only one alien