English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Citation network analysis has become one of methods to study how scientificknowledge flows from one domain to another. Health informatics is amultidisciplinary field that includes social science, software engineering,behavioral science, medical science and others. In this study, we perform ananalysis of citation statistics from health informatics journals using data setextracted from CrossRef. For each health informatics journal, we extract thenumber of citations from/to studies related to computer science,medicine/clinical medicine and other fields, including the number ofself-citations from the health informatics journal. With a similar number ofarticles used in our analysis, we show that the Journal of the American MedicalInformatics Association (JAMIA) has more in-citations than the Journal ofMedical Internet Research (JMIR); while JMIR has a higher number ofout-citations and self-citations. We also show that JMIR cites more articlesfrom health informatics journals and medicine related journals. In addition,the Journal of Medical Systems (JMS) cites more articles from computer sciencejournals compared with other health informatics journals included in ouranalysis.

Characterizing health informatics journals by subject-level dependencies: a citation network analysis