English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The authors of the comment[Phys. Rev. A 97, 046101 (2018)] raise that theinconsistency in calculating some common quantum-speed-limit (QSL) bounds,which is presented in our paper [Phys. Rev. A 95, 052118 (2017)], does notexist in their paper [Phys. Rev. A 94, 052125 (2016)]. Therefore they insistthat their criticism to some QSL bounds is still valid. We demonstrate all theQSL bounds mentioned in the comment are similar in essence. We also show theinconsistency which is presented in their original paper can not be used tosupport their criticism. Furthermore, we exhibit although the inconsistencypresented in our paper is not a same one to which is presented by the authorsof the comment, it exists and be unavoidable in their example. Accordingly, webelieve the result in our paper is usable in numerical calculations.

Reply to "Comment on 'Modified quantum-speed-limit bounds for open quantum dynamics in quantum channels'"