English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Different communities rely heavily on software, but use quite differentsoftware development practices. {\bf Objective}: We wanted to measure the stateof the practice in the area of statistical software for psychology tounderstand how it compares to best practices. {\bf Method}: We compared andranked 30 software tools with respect to adherence to best software engineeringpractices on items that could be measured by end-users. {\bf Results} We foundthat R packages use quite good practices, that while commercial packages werequite usable, many aspects of their development is too opaque to be measures,and that research projects vary a lot in their practices. {\bf Conclusion} Werecommend that more organizations adopt practices similar to those used by CRANto facilitate success, even for small teams. We also recommend close couplingof source code and documentation, to improve verifiability.

Statistical Software for Psychology: Comparing Development Practices Between CRAN and Other Communities