English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The ISO 26262 standard from 2016 represents the state of the art for asafety-guided development of safety-critical electric/electronic vehiclesystems. These vehicle systems include advanced driver assistance systems andvehicle guidance systems. The development process proposed in the ISO 26262standard is based upon multiple V-models, and defines activities and workproducts for each process step. In many of these process steps, scenario basedapproaches can be applied to achieve the defined work products for thedevelopment of automated driving functions. To accomplish the work products ofdifferent process steps, scenarios have to focus on various aspects like ahuman understandable notation or a description via time-space variables. Thisleads to contradictory requirements regarding the level of detail and way ofnotation for the representation of scenarios. In this paper, the authorspresent requirements for the representation of scenarios in different processsteps defined by the ISO 26262 standard, propose a consistent terminology basedon prior publications for the identified levels of abstraction, and demonstratehow scenarios can be systematically evolved along the phases of the developmentprocess outlined in the ISO 26262 standard.

Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehicles