English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We comment two incorrect statements given in Ref.1. (A) - In order to showthat the electron-phonon interaction (EPI) is very small and irrelevant forsuperconductivity in 1UC FeSe/SrTiO3 system, the authors of Ref.1 use an EPIcoupling constant which does not enter in any theory of superconductivity. So,their conclusion on the smallness of the EPI in 1UC FeSe/SrTiO3 is incorrect.Accordingly, their coupling constant has also nothing to do with the EPIcoupling with the forward scattering peak (EPI-FSP), which is proposed recentlyin order to explain high Tc in 1UC FeSe/SrTiO3. (B) - In Ref.1 it is claimedthat the experimentally resolved ARPES replica bands can be explained by theLDA+DMFT method. We show that this statement is also incorrect, i.e. theLDA+DMFT method in Ref.1 is unable to explain the replica bands.

Comment on paper arXiv:17070526v1 "Electronic structure of FeSe monolayer superconductors: shallow bands and correlations" by Sadovskii group