English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Hiring a head coach of a college sports team is vital which will definitelyhave a great influence on the later development of the team. However, a lot ofattention has been focused on each coach's individual features. A systematicand quantitative analysis of the whole coach hiring market is lacking. In acoach hiring network, the coaches are actually voting with their feet. It isinteresting to analyze what factors are affecting the "footprint" left by thosehead coaches. In this paper, we collect more than 12,000 head coach hiringrecords in two different popular sports from the NCAA. Using network-basedmethods, we build the coach hiring network in the NCAA men's basketball andfootball. We find that: (1).the coach hiring network is of great inequality incoach production with a Gini coefficient close to 0.60. (2).coaches prefer towork within the same geographical region and the same division to their almamaters'. (3).the coach production rankings we calculated using network-basedmethods are generally correlated to the authoritative rankings, but also showdisaccord in specific time period. The results provide us a novel view andbetter understanding of the coach hiring market in the NCAA and shed new lighton the coach hiring system.

Inequalities, Preferences and Rankings in US Sports Coach Hiring Networks