English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Nowadays, protecting trust in social sciences also means engaging in opencommunity dialogue, which helps to safeguard robustness and improve efficiencyof research methods. The combination of open data, open review and opendialogue may sound simple but implementation in the real world will not bestraightforward. However, in view of Begley and Ellis's (2012) statement that,"the scientific process demands the highest standards of quality, ethics andrigour," they are worth implementing. More importantly, they are feasible towork on and likely will help to restore plausibility to social sciencesresearch. Therefore, I feel it likely that the triplet of open data, openreview and open dialogue will gradually emerge to become policy requirementsregardless of the research funding source.

Open data, open review and open dialogue in making social sciences plausible