English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We complement the rich conceptual work on organizational corruption byquantitatively modelling the spread of corruption within organizations. Wesystematically vary four organizational culture-related parameters, i.e.,organization structure, location of bad apple, employees propensity to becomecorrupted (corruption probability), and number of whistle-blowers. Oursimulation studies find that in organizations with flatter structures,corruption permeates the organization at a lower threshold value of corruptionprobability compared to those with taller structures. However, the finalproportion of corrupted individuals is higher in the latter as compared to theformer. Also, we find that for a 1,000 strong organization, 5 percent of theworkforce is a critical threshold in terms of the number of whistle-blowersneeded to constrain the spread of corruption, and if this number is around 25percent, the corruption contagion is negligible. Implications of our resultsare discussed.

Modelling the Impact of Organization Structure and Whistle Blowers on Intra-Organizational Corruption Contagion