English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

On October 2016 the South Korean cyber military unit was the victim of asuccessful cyber attack that allowed access to internal networks. Per usualwith large scale attacks against South Korean entities, the hack wasimmediately attributed to North Korea. Also, per other large-scale cybersecurity incidents, the same types of 'evidence' were used for attributionpurposes. Disclosed methods of attribution provide weak evidence, and theprocedure Korean organizations tend to use for information disclosure lead manyto question any conclusions. We will analyze and discuss a number of issueswith the current way that South Korean organizations disclose cyber attackinformation to the public. A time line of events and disclosures will beconstructed and analyzed in the context of appropriate measures for cyberwarfare. Finally, we will examine the South Korean cyber military attack interms previously proposed cyber warfare response guidelines. Specifically,whether any of the guidelines can be applied to this real-world case, and ifso, is South Korea justified in declaring war based on the most recent cyberattack.

A Case Study of the 2016 Korean Cyber Command Compromise