English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the past several decades, many authorship attribution studies have usedcomputational methods to determine the authors of disputed texts. Disputedauthorship is a common problem in Classics, since little information aboutancient documents has survived the centuries. Many scholars have questioned theauthenticity of the final chapter of Xenophon's Cyropaedia, a 4th century B.C.historical text. In this study, we use N-grams frequency vectors with a cosinesimilarity function and word frequency vectors with Naive Bayes Classifiers(NBC) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) to analyze the authorship of theCyropaedia. Although the N-gram analysis shows that the epilogue of theCyropaedia differs slightly from the rest of the work, comparing the analysisof Xenophon with analyses of Aristotle and Plato suggests that this differenceis not significant. Both NBC and SVM analyses of word frequencies show that thefinal chapter of the Cyropaedia is closely related to the other chapters of theCyropaedia. Therefore, this analysis suggests that the disputed chapter waswritten by Xenophon. This information can help scholars better understand theCyropaedia and also demonstrates the usefulness of applying modern authorshipanalysis techniques to classical literature.

Authorship Analysis of Xenophon's Cyropaedia