English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

How can we justify the validity of our computer security methods? Thismeta-methodological question is related to recent explorations on the scienceof computer security, which have been hindered by computer security's uniqueproperties. We confront this by developing a taxonomy of properties andmethods. Interdisciplinary foundations provide a solid grounding for a set ofessential concepts, including a decision tree for characterizing adversarialinteraction. Several types of invalidation and general ways of addressing themare described for technical methods. An interdisciplinary argument from theoryexplains the role that meta-methodological validation plays in the adversarialscience of computer security.

Validating Computer Security Methods: Meta-methodology for an Adversarial Science