English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Human activity follows an approximately 24-hour day-night cycle, but there issignificant individual variation in awake and sleep times. Individuals withcircadian rhythms at the extremes can be categorized into two chronotypes:"larks", those who wake up and go to sleep early, and "owls", those who stay upand wake up late. It is well established that a person's chronotype can affecttheir activities and health. However, less is known on the effects ofchronotypes on the social behavior, even though it is evident that socialinteractions require coordinated timings. To study how chronotypes relate tosocial behavior, we use data collected using a smartphone app on a populationof more than seven hundred volunteer students to simultaneously determine theirchronotypes and social network structure. We find that owls maintain largerpersonal networks, albeit with less time spent per contact. On average, owlsare more central in the social network of students than larks, frequentlyoccupying the dense core of the network. Owls also display strong homophily, asseen in an unexpectedly large number of social ties connecting owls to owls.

Social Network Differences of Chronotypes Identified from Mobile Phone Data