English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In arXiv:1707.08641, Tim Maudlin claims to construct a counterexample to theresult of Proc. Roy. Soc. A vol. 473, iss. 2202, 2017 (arXiv:1607.07871), inwhich it was shown that no realist model satisfying a certain notion oftime-symmetry (in addition to three other assumptions) can reproduce thepredictions of quantum theory without retrocausality (influences travellingbackwards in time). In this comment, I explain why Maudlin's model is not acounterexample because it does not satisfy our time-symmetry assumption. I alsoexplain why Maudlin's claim that one of the Lemmas we used in our proof isincorrect is wrong.

Time Symmetric Quantum Theory Without Retrocausality? A Reply to Tim Maudlin