English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Does normalization help Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging accuracy on noisy,non-canonical data? To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the actualimpact of normalization in a real-world scenario, where gold error detection isnot available. We investigate the effect of automatic normalization on POStagging of tweets. We also compare normalization to strategies that leveragelarge amounts of unlabeled data kept in its raw form. Our results show thatnormalization helps, but does not add consistently beyond just word embeddinglayer initialization. The latter approach yields a tagging model that iscompetitive with a Twitter state-of-the-art tagger.

To Normalize, or Not to Normalize: The Impact of Normalization on Part-of-Speech Tagging