English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

If several independent algorithms for a computer-calculated quantity exist,then one can expect their results (which differ because of numerical errors) tofollow approximately Gaussian distribution. The mean of this distribution,interpreted as the value of the quantity of interest, can be determined withbetter precision than what is the precision provided by a single algorithm.Often, with lack of enough independent algorithms, one can proceed differently:many practical algorithms introduce a bias using a parameter, e.g. a small butfinite number to compute a limit or a large but finite number (cutoff) toapproximate infinity. One may vary such parameter of a single algorithm andinterpret the resulting numbers as generated by several algorithms. A numericalevidence for the validity of this approach is shown for differentiation.

Method of precision increase by averaging with application to numerical differentiation