English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Plastino and Rocca [Physica A 491, 1023 (2018)] recently criticized our work[Phys. Lett. A 381, 207 (2017)] on the ground that one should use functionalcalculus instead of the ordinary calculus adopted by us in the entropymaximization procedure. We simply point out that our work requires right fromthe beginning $\partial S_q / \partial U = \beta$, whereas the formalism ofPlastino and Rocca yields $\partial S_q/\partial U = q \beta Z^{1-q} \neq\beta$. Therefore, the work of Plastino and Rocca is irrelevant for our work.

Reply to "Rescuing the MaxEnt treatment for $q$-generalized entropies" by A. Plastino and M.C. Rocca