English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

There has been a growing body of study on the relationship betweenpublic/political discourse and its moral-emotional foundations. Most of thestudies, however, have been confined to a single country's context, lackingcross-cultural perspectives. Taking a comparative perspective, we examined theemotional and moral structures of political and public discussion observed inthe U.S. and Japan by employing extensive text data that cover these twocountries. Specifically, we conducted dictionary-based sentiment and moralanalyses of floor debate in the U.S. Congress and the Japanese Diet over a longperiod of time. The analyses revealed intriguing cross-national patterns in themoral-emotional framework employed in parliamentary deliberations, which castdoubt on some of the dominant arguments in the field, including, among others,J. Haidt's moral foundation hypothesis.

Moral Foundations of Political Discourse: Comparative Analysis of the Speech Records of the US Congress and the Japanese Diet