English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective probability in quantum mechanics is often thought to involve astochastic process whereby an actual future is selected from a range ofpossibilities. Everett's seminal idea is that all possible definite futures onthe pointer basis exist as components of a macroscopic linear superposition. Idemonstrate that these two conceptions of what is involved in quantum processesare linked by two alternative interpretation of the mind-body relation. Thisleads to a fission, rather than divergence, interpretation of Everettian theoryand to a novel explanation of why a principle of indifference does not apply toself-location uncertainty for a post-measurement, pre-observation subject, justas Sebens and Carroll claim. Their Epistemic Separability Principle is shown toarise out of this explanation and the derivation of the Born rule forEverettian theory is thereby put on a firmer footing.

Objective Probability and the Mind-Body Relation