English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In this paper we investigate the links between instantiated argumentationsystems and the axioms for non-monotonic reasoning described in [9] with theaim of characterising the nature of argument based reasoning. In doing so, weconsider two possible interpretations of the consequence relation, and describewhich axioms are met by ASPIC+ under each of these interpretations. We thenconsider the links between these axioms and the rationality postulates. Ourresults indicate that argument based reasoning as characterised by ASPIC+ is -according to the axioms of [9] - non-cumulative and non-monotonic, andtherefore weaker than the weakest non-monotonic reasoning systems theyconsidered possible. This weakness underpins ASPIC+'s success in modellingother reasoning systems, and we conclude by considering the relationshipbetween ASPIC+ and other weak logical systems.

On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning