English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Classical physics has enabled the acquisition of significant knowledge of thephysical properties of nature on a standard macroscopic scale. Theseachievements were driven by use of the causal ontological approach (proposedoriginally by Aristotle) to formulate models of physical reality. At thebeginning of the 20th century, however, the physics community began to prefermodels based on a fundamentally different approach to human knowledge.Copenhagen quantum mechanics (CQM) was used to describe the micro-world. Thespecial theory of relativity was used to describe the kinematics of objectsmoving at high velocity values in both the macroscopic and microscopic regions.This phenomenological approach to knowledge has been more focused on how thingsappear - instead of their actual properties and causal sequence. In the middleof the 20th century, the causal ontological approach was used to develop asignificant scientific advance: the systematization of fundamental stronglyinteracting particles on the basis of unified algebra in three-dimensionalisotopic spin space for spin values 1, 1/2, and 0. However, it was laterstrongly deformed under the influence of the phenomenological approach and thequark model. This paper will show that practically all contemporary theoreticalmodels of physical reality contain mistakes or unresolved problems. Furtherscientific progress can be obtained if (and only if) scientists return to thesuccessful causal ontological approach and falsification. Classical physics maybe slightly generalized to enable the description of inertia mass increase independence on velocity, replacing the relativity theory and CQM. Newassumptions may then be employed using generalized classical physics (GCP) toformulate new descriptions of observed phenomena that were previouslyinaccurately interpreted and used to promote fundamentally inadequate theories.

The Contemporary State of Fundamental Physical Research and the Future Path to Scientific Knowledge